Determination
of PCR Efficiency (main)
Determination
of PCR Efficiency (1)
Determination
of PCR Efficiency (2)
Determination
of PCR Efficiency (3)
Determination
of PCR Efficiency (4)
Determination
of PCR Efficiency (5)
Determination
of real-time PCR amplification efficiency
taken
from Chapter 3: Quantification strategies in real-time PCR
by Michael W. Pfaffl Download Chapter 3 PDF in: A-Z of quantitative PCR (
Editor: S.A. Bustin ) International University Line
(IUL), La Jolla, CA, USA
Individual samples
generate different and individual fluorescence histories in kinetic
RT-PCR. The shapes of amplification curves differ in the steepness of
any fluorescence increase and in the absolute fluorescence levels at
plateau depending on background fluorescence levels. The PCR efficiency
has a major impact on the fluorescence history and the accuracy of the
calculated expression result and is critically influenced by PCR
reaction components. Efficiency evaluation is an essential
marker in gene quantification procedure. Constant amplification
efficiency in all compared samples is one important criterion for
reliable comparison between samples. This becomes crucially important
when analyzing the relationship between an unknown sequence versus a
standard sequence, which is performed in all relative quantification
models. In experimental designs employing standardization with
housekeeping genes, the demand for invariable amplification efficiency
between target and standard is often ignored, despite the fact that
corrections have been suggested. A correction for
efficiency, as performed in efficiency corrected
mathematically models, is strongly recommended and results in a
more reliable estimation of the ‘real expression ratio’ compared to NO
efficiency correction. Small efficiency differences between
target and reference gene generate false expression ratio, and the
researcher over- or under-estimates the ‘real’ initial mRNA amount.
The assessment of the
exact amplification efficiencies of target and reference genes must be
carried out before any calculation of the normalized gene expression is
done. LightCycler Relative Expression
Software, Q-Gene, REST and REST-XL software applications allow the
evaluation of amplification efficiency plots. Different tissues exhibit
different PCR efficiencies, caused by RT inhibitors, PCR inhibitors and
by variations in the total RNA fraction pattern extracted.
Several methods are described in the
literature to calculate real-time PCR efficiency:
- Estimation via "sigmoidal" or
"logistic" curve fitting models
- Estimation via "theoretical
sigmoidal fit" (all fluorescence data points, Liu &
Saint 2002)
- Estimation via "experimental
four parametric sigmoidal model fit" (all data points,
Tichopad et al. 2002)
- Estimation via "experimental
four parametric logistic model fit" (all fluorescence data
points, Tichopad et al. 2003)
- ERRATUM: correction of Figure 2 Tichopad et al. 2003
- PCR Efficiency estimation via
"experimental four parametric sigmoidal model fit" (all data points, Tichopad et
al. MCP 2004 - Inhibition of real-time RT–PCR
quantification due to tissue-specific contaminants)
- Locked nucleic acid (LNA)
single nucleotide
polymorphism (SNP) genotype analysis and validation using real-time PCR
using a SDM method (Johnson et al. 2004)
- Sigmoidal curve-fitting
redefines quantitative real-time PCR with the prospective of developing
automated high-throughput applications. (Rutledge 2004)
- Improved real-time RT-PCR
method for high-throughput measurements using second derivative
calculation and double correction. (Luu The et al. 2005)
- Gene expression of
HIF-1 α and XRCC4 measured in human
samples by real-time RT-PCR using the sigmoidal
curve-fitting method (Hao-Qiu et al., 2007)
- Model
based analysis of real-time PCR data from DNA binding dye
protocols (Alvarez et al., 2007)
- A kinetic-based sigmoidal model for the
polymerase chain reaction and its application to high-capacity absolute
quantitative real-time PCR (Rutledge & Stewart,
2008)
- A new real-time PCR
method to overcome significant quantitative inaccuracy due to slight
amplification inhibition (Guescini et al., 2008)
- Highly accurate
sigmoidal fitting of real-time PCR data by introducing a
parameter for asymmetry. (Spiess et al., 2008)
- qpcR: an R package for sigmoidal model
selection in quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis
(Ritz & Spiess, 2008)
Determination
of PCR
efficiencies in competitive RT-PCR
Various
external effects on PCR amplification
effiency
|
- Absolute
and relative real-time PCR in the quantification of tst gene expression
among methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: evaluation by two
mathematical models.
Chini
V, Foka A, Dimitracopoulos G, Spiliopoulou I. 2007 download PDF
- Enhancing the
efficiency of a PCR using gold nanoparticles.
Li M, Lin YC, Wu CC, Liu HS. 2006 download
PDF
- PCR inhibition by
reverse transcriptase leads to an overestimation of amplification
efficiency.
Suslov O, Steindler
DA. download
PDF
- Relative
quantification of mRNA: comparison of methods currently used for
real-time PCR data analysis.
Cikos
S, Bukovská A, Koppel J., 2007 download
PDF
- Overview article - Comprehensive Algorithm for
Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
Sheng Zhao
and
Russell D. Fernald, 2005 download
PDF
- Technical Note - Evaluation of Real-Time PCR
Amplification Efficiencies to Detect PCR Inhibitors
Elias
J. Kontanis and Floyd A. Reed, 2006 download
PDF
- Estimation of the reaction
efficiency in polymerase chain reaction
Nadia
Lalam, 2006 download
PDF
- Molelling
the PCR amplification process by a size-dependent branching process and
estimation of the efficiency
Lalam et al., 2004
download
PDF
- Statistical
Inference for Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction Using a Hidden
Markov Model: A Bayesian Approach Lalam,
2007 download PDF
- Evaluation
of absolute quantitation by nonlinear regression in probe-based
real-time PCR
Goll et al., 2006
download
PDF
- Mathematical
Model of Real-Time PCR Kinetics
Gevertz
et al., 2005
download
PDF
|